Article details
Volume 77 Number 1
Krystian Gałęcki1, Gastón Courtade2, Aisling McFall3, Renata Prieschl Teixeira4, Maja Grgic5, Marta Esteve-Sisteré6, Rikke Maglemose Westphalen7, Agnieszka Kowalska-Baron1*
1 Institute of General Food Chemistry, Lodz University of Technology, 90-924 Lodz, Poland
2 Norwegian University of Science and Technology, 7491 Trondheim, Norway
3 Queens University Belfast, BT7 1NN, Northern Ireland
4 Universidade Federal de São Paulo, 04021-001, São Paulo, Brazil
5 Josip Juraj Strossmayer University of Osijek, 31000, Osijek, Croatia
6 ETSEA-University of Lleida, 25198 Lleida, Spain bolsos de imitacion
7 Technical University of Denmark, 2800 KongensLyngby, Denmark
new generation dental implant
There are many types of new generation dental implants that have characteristics and different advantages. Here are some things you should consider when looking for a new generation dental implant:
-
Materials used: new generation dental implants can be made from different materials, such as titanium, zirconium or ceramic. Each material has its own advantages and disadvantages, and the choice of material will depend on your needs and your health dental.
-
Technology used: some new generation dental implants are designed with advanced technologies, such as laser sintering technology, which makes it possible to create implants of high quality with maximum precision.
-
Design: some new generation dental implants are designed with an innovative design that makes them makes it more aesthetic and more comfortable to wear.
-
Lifespan: New generation dental implants may have a longer lifespan than traditional dental implants, making them more economical in the long run.
It is important to discuss these items with your surgeon or dentist to determine which type a new generation dental implant would be the most suitable for your situation. They can provide you with detailed information and help you make an informed decision.
Pages: 25-36
This study was motivated by the need to provide more insight into the possible mechanism of the intermolecular interactions between antispasmodic drug drotaverine and one of the serum albumins (BSA), with the aim to indicate the most probable sites of these interactions. For this purpose both experimental (spectrofluorometric titration at various temperatures) and theoretical (molecular mechanics) methods have been applied. The obtained results clearly showed that drotaverine quenched BSA fluorescence, and the most probable mechanism is static quenching. The negative value of the theoretically predicted binding free Gibbs energy (-23.8 kJ/mol) confirmed the existence of the intermolecular interactions involving drotaverine and one tryptophan within BSA protein and was well agreed with the experimentally determined value of -25.2 kJ/mol.